The OtterBox Warranty Department asked that I provide them with pictures of the problematic OtterBox I purchased. Here they’re, as you can see the bottom iTunes Port cover has a small rubber line that is suppose to fit into the hard shell case, mine was defective upon receiving it. It worked fine for a while then just stopped working completely.
— Previous article
Why DomainPeople's New Domain Manager Sucks
Next article —
Car Paint Damage (Chips, and Pits)
You May Also Like
Ubuntu apt-key not working? Behind a Firewall? Open port port 11371 or use http://:80
- byJordan
- April 12, 2012
I was trying to get some Ubuntu PGP Key’s for some ppa.launchpad.net sources, and apt-key kept erroring out.…
WordPress Permalink Sub-Directory 404 Error Weirdness
- byJordan
- August 14, 2011
I didn’t really know what to put for the title of this post, but hopefully the content makes…
Microsoft changes mind, agrees to fix IE’s URI handler
- byJordan
- October 11, 2007
Microsoft agrees to release a patch to fix some of the security issues but not all in Internet Explorers URI Handler. I don't understand why Microsoft has such a lazy stance on security, I want to use Internet Explorer just as securely as any other browser. One mis-typed url after a fresh install of Windows could cause malicious software to gain entry to me desktop.
Microsoft changes mind, agrees to fix IE's URI handler - Microsoft has stated that they will be releasing a patch to fix some, but not all, potential security flaws resulting from third-party applications being fed maliciously malformed URI requests.Read More...
AMD 64 2000+ vs Intel’s Atom: AMD’s 8-watt processor outperforms Intels Atom
- byJordan
- August 18, 2008
Intel's Atom processor and AMD's 64 2000+ were pitted against each other. And the results were for once in favor of AMD.
In our Munich lab’s duel of the energy-savers, the AMD Athlon 64 2000+ beats the Intel Atom 230 in energy consumption and processing power. Each of the systems was based on a desktop platform. The Achilles heel of the Intel system is its old system platform with the 945GC chipset, while AMD offers a more modern 780G platform. The energy-saving solution from AMD offers more possibilities: it has three times as many SATA ports, possesses better onboard graphics performance, and can also support two monitors. Unlike the Intel solution, an HD resolution (1920x1200) with high picture quality is possible through DVI/HDMI ports. And early information suggests that the AMD Athlon 64 2000+ should cost close to $90.Read the full article at tomshardware.com
How to Increase Exim4 Logging Information
- byJordan
- June 16, 2020
This is pretty simple to do, the syntax is as follows. However, depending on your OS, you will…
IIS Site Slow to Load on First Visit/Load (SiteFinity)
- byJordan
- November 26, 2012
I had to deploy a new website that was done by a web design company, it was created…